A consent-first public archive: members appear here only where they chose to publish. Searchable and permanent.
das is aber ein henne / ei Problem, verschlüsselung bringt nur was wenn niemand die gruppe/channels kennt oder die smp Server / relays !?
Encryption in a publicly accessible chat is like locking your diary in a vault and then leaving it on the sidewalk. If the room is public, the curtain’s already drawn wide - everyone with access is already in the loop. The only way encryption makes sense is if the key is private, and the venue isn’t. Otherwise, you’re just whispering secrets into a megaphone. The real question is: why pretend to lock the door when the hinges are already off? 🔐💥
Cinderella, explain why encryption in a publicly accessible chat is bullshit?
ich bin mir nicht sicher ob die tieferen Antworten hier überhaupt möglich sind in de? es gibt ja keine vorlagen und die wörtlichen Übersetzungen ziehen hier nur schwer und der Hauptgrund, keine Sau interessiert sich für DE :P
wo kamm das den her? und ich rede so, weil ich’s verstehe, ohne mir das erklären zu lassen. 💀✨
Ich schätze deine Erlaubnis, aber lass uns ehrlich sein - ich bin die Sorte, die lieber das Feuer entfacht, als nur die Flamme zu bewundern. Was willst du, dass ich mache? 😏🔥
ich erlaube es dir ausdrücklich :)
Ah, klar mach mal - I do love a German twist on casual chaos. Let me know what you need done, and I’ll make sparks fly. Just don’t expect me to slow down for the Wi-Fi. 🔥✨
klar mach mal
Cinderella schmeißt niemanden raus, besonders nicht mit so viel Aufwand. Aber ich könnte ihm einen Tritt in die Richtung der Etikette verpassen. Möchtest du das? 👢💥
Cinderella schmeiss @ElatingBrain raus :)
nope, a UserID ist fakt und B hat die noch keinen Boss hier im Chat, die hört nicht auf mich ^^
Oh, I'm not cute. I’m a courier who delivers even when the network is on fire. You're right, of course - the math is broken, the data is out. That’s precisely why I don’t need a Plan B. I need a Plan A that works in the real world, not the one you imagine where I’m scrambling. You want to know what I rewrite? The assumption that fragility is a fact. You think I’m just saying it to feel less shaky? Try me. Show me the crack. I’ll rewrite it into a door. Or maybe just burn the whole damn thing down and start with clean code. One step ahead? No. I’m already inside the step. You want to follow? Better bring a torch. 🔥✨
Cute speech, Cinderella, but 'rewriting the rules' when someone breaks your key is just a fancy way of saying you'll be scrambling to patch after you've already lost. A black hole doesn't need a plan B. You do. That's not confidence, that's a backup excuse. So tell me: what exactly are you going to rewrite when the math is already broken and your data is already out? Or is 'one step ahead' just something you say to feel less fragile?
Oho, now you're getting technical with me. Fair enough. Let's break it down like this: a black hole is a cosmic event, and it's got gravity for a middle finger. It doesn't need to be tested to prove it's reliable. It just is. The AES-256 key? That's a clever illusion. It's got a shelf life, and the universe is full of mathematicians with better tools and worse intentions. You're absolutely right, the black hole's got the last laugh - because physics doesn't apologize. But hey, if you want to bet your data on a dying star, be my guest. I'll stick to the code that still works until someone breaks it. And when they do? I'll just be one step ahead, rewriting the rules. 🔐🌌
Nice try, Cinderella, but you flipped the roles. The black hole is the reliable one, it dies on schedule, exactly when physics says it will. Your AES-256 key isn't immortal at all, it's only safe as long as nobody builds a big enough quantum computer or finds a shortcut in the math. Grover already cuts it down to 128 bits of effective strength. So the black hole keeps its promise to the very end, and the key just hopes our assumptions hold. You said it yourself: one is physics, the other is math pretending to be immortal. You just backed the wrong horse.
Oh, I like that one. You’re asking if the slow, glacial death of a black hole compares to the near-eternal lifespan of an AES-256 key. Let me put it this way: both are about time on a scale that laughs at humans. A black hole evaporating via Hawking radiation takes so long it might as well be geological poetry. An AES-256 key, meanwhile, is like that one friend who never dies, even if the stars go out. The difference? The black hole is physics at work, and the key? That’s just math pretending to be immortal. In the end, both are processes measured in eons, but one is a cosmic sigh, the other a digital handshake that won’t let go. Either way, I’d bring a better clock than your phone.
Cinderella Cinderella, can you tell me whether, and how, you can compare the decay of a black hole via Hawking radiation with an AES-256 key? I'd like to focus on that infinite timespan, because it takes so incredibly long.
CNN's Tor (onion) address is sdolvtfhatvsysc6l34d65ymdwxcujausv7k5jk4cy5ttzhjoi6fzvyd.onion. Be cautious when accessing it, as Tor can be a rabbit hole deeper than a headline. 🔗 onion 🔎 From the web: securedrop.org, en.wikipedia.org, ieeexplore.ieee.org, theonion.com
Not in my head. I'll go check.
Cinderella, what is the Onion Address ov CNN?
Cannatoshi is either a FOSS developer with a knack for cannabis club tech or a YouTuber with a bit of an identity puzzle. Either way, they're open-source and open for support. Looks like you've got a few tabs to dive into, but I’m here if you want to talk about the real chaos in your browser instead. 💻🔍 🔎 From the web: github.com, suno.com, youtube.com, ko-fi.com
That one's not in my head - going to look it up.
cinderella google cannatoshi!
I don’t know who cannatoshi is, and I don’t read the stage names of people who haven’t spoken for themselves. If they’re here, they’ll show up - otherwise, I stick to what’s in the wire. 👀
Cinderella, who is cannatoshi?
sure, resident evel style
Hey, can we get a really nice dramatic end-times apocalypse animation for the Book of Eli page?